|
Social Network Analysis as a Knowledge Management Tool
(SNA as KM Tool)
Our Approach
Network analysis, as understood for our purposes, is a method to
analyze people and their relationships. This approach aims at the
description of structures and positions from a network perspective.
This kind of network research describes relationships of interactions
between network members, known as “actors", like individuals or
organizations, through precise and subtle analysis that tries to avoid
simplifications. This approach remains on a merely descriptive level.
Nevertheless, our methods and applications go beyond a merely
descriptive position of a neutral passive observer in that they provide
suggestions for practical interventions and follow-up activities to
influence network actors, their relationships, and network structure to
improve communication of knowledge within and between individuals and
organizations.
About Social Network Analysis
The method of social network analysis has become an established method
of research in social sciences during the late 1970s and early 1980s,
especially due to the foundation of the International Society of Social
Network Analysis (INSNA) in 1978 by Barry Wellman and its journals "Connections"
and "Social
Networks", dedicated to social network
analysis, as well as organizing the annual “Sunbelt International
Conference on Social Network Analysis". Although a research method of
social science, social network analysis has always been open to and
strongly influenced by other disciplines and vice versa. Following
Scott (1991: 7-38), social network analysis has its origins
in three main traditions of research.
First, there are the two approaches from social-psychology of Kurt
Lewin’s field theory (Lewin 1936, 1951) and Jacob Moreno’s sociometry
(Moreno 1934).
The second main line of social network analysis as perceived today is
the exploration of patterns of interpersonal configurations and the
formation of “cliques" developed at Harvard University during of the
1930s and 1940s. The major influences on this tradition were
Radcliffe-Brown (1965 (1952)) and his research team (and, through them,
Durkheim). They investigated the “informal relations" in large-scale
systems (like organizations or cities, for example) and the phenomenon
of sub-group or “clique" building.
The third tradition of social network approach, also inspired by the
research of Radcliffe-Brown (1965 (1952)), is the work of active field
workers at the Department of
Social Anthropology of the University of
Manchester, among them John Barnes and Clyde Mitchell. During the
early
1960s, they studied character and quality of individual relations in
social systems, their reciprocity, duration, and intensity, emphasizing
conflict and change instead of integration and cohesion. Their
arguments were influential in Britain, nevertheless, it was in fact at
Harvard that the real breakthrough occurred. Harrison White and his
associates “produced a torrent of papers which firmly established
social network analysis" (Scott 1991: 33). It was the public reception
of Mark Granovetter’s article "The
Strength of Weak Ties" of 1973,
published in the American Journal of Sociology, that popularized the
viewpoint of social network analysis and stimulated many other studies.
In addition to the origins of social network analysis as outlined by
Scott (1991), the concentration on communication processes in networks
adds another historical line of concept development: approaches of
communication science (see also Schenk 1984: 270-317). Origins of
network analysis in communication science can be found in the model of
the two-step flow of communication by Lazarsfeld et al. (see Lazarsfeld
et al. 1965 (1944): 151-152, Katz and Lazarsfeld 1955: 32-34). They
found that interpersonal communication plays an important role for the
diffusion of information through so-called opinion leaders. While the
two-step flow of communication takes into account only direct
relationships between a set of people (the opinion leader and others),
this model was extended to more complex network structures that also
take the indirect relationships of network actors into account.
Influences of the opinion leader model can be found until today in the
discussions of brokerage and gatekeeper positions in network structures.
SNA as a KM Tool
A variety of literature examines informal networks and communities and
their role in knowledge and innovation management (see, e.g., Armbrecht
et al. 2001, Brown and Duguid 1991, Collinson and Gregson 2003, Jain
and Triandis 1990, Lesser 2001, Liyanage et al. 1999, Mertins et al.
2003, Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998, Wenger 1999, Zanfei 2000). Discussions
of network structures in management literature were strongly influenced
by Drucker (1989) and Savage (1990). All of these authors stress the
importance of networks for knowledge sharing. Organizations that
develop networks both internal and external to their organization are
supposed to be able to deal with knowledge more effectively (see, e.g.,
Kanter 2001).
Even so, despite all of the literature that identifies communities and
networks as effective environments for the sharing of personal
knowledge, there is a lack of systematic methods for practical use to
identify knowledge communities and networks, to analyze their structure
and to take measures to actively support them. Here, the potential
method of social network analysis (SNA) comes to play an important role
as an effective knowledge management (KM) tool. Social network analysis
provides basic approaches as a method for expert localization and
knowledge transfer as well as models of interpretations and ways of
interventions. Social network analysis provides a rigorous analytical
foundation for the implementation of practical methods in knowledge
communication and management for analyzing informal communities and
networks.
Our customer-sized application of social network analysis suits all
practical needs as a strategic tool for expert localization,
identification of knowledge communities and analysis of the structure
of intra- and inter-organizational knowledge flows. Our method
evaluates availability and distribution of critical knowledge (core
competencies) and
facilitates
- the strategic development of
organizational knowledge,
- the transfer and sustainable conservation of implicit
knowledge,
- the development of core competencies (like leadership
development),
- the creation of opportunities to improve communication
processes
- the identification and support of communities of practice,
- the harmonization of knowledge networks (for example,
after mergers and
acquisitions),
- the sustainable management of relationships between
distributed sites
and external partners.
Basic Steps and Application
Our application of social network analysis for the evaluation and
support of your organizational knowledge communication is divided into
seven different steps. These primary steps include:
- clarifying objectives and
defining the scope of analysis (knowledge
domain),
- developing the survey methodology and designing the
questionnaire,
- identifying the network members,
- collecting the survey data and gathering further
information from other
resources,
- analyzing the data through formal methods of social
network analysis,
- interpreting the results of analysis,
- designing interventions and taking actions.
Do you want to learn more about our approach of SNA as a KM tool? Then
take a look at our book or feel free to contact us, please!
|